1 AIT Asian Institute of Technology

Road transportation in the development of rural regions : a comparative study of Tha Rua and Bo Thong districts in Thailand

AuthorMalee Uabharadorn
Call NumberAIT Diss. no. HS-96-07
Subject(s)Transportation, Automotive--Thailand

NoteA dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
PublisherAsian Institute of Technology
Series StatementDissertation ; no. HS-96-07
AbstractThe network of roads, quality of roads, modes of transportation, services of rural transportation, flow system and impact of rural roads in the context of rural regions are the major issues of this study. Organization of space, diffusion of modern production practices, incentives to rural producers, contribution to generate employment and income opportunities, and balancing ruralurban migration, increasing administrative inefficiency, and reduction of rural urban disparity are considered to be the most likely impacts and outputs of improving rural roads and transportation system. Thus this study has aimed to examine and analyze connectivity of places, flow of goods and services and accessibility to places of higher order centers in contributing the overall development, improvement of household lifestyle, and economic activities in the rural regions of Thailand. The specific objectives are: (1) to identify and analyze the existing network of road transportation; (2) to identify the present bases of flows of commodities and people, at different levels and between different hierarchies of places; (3) to identify and analyze the demand for rural transportation (flow of services) and the vehicle capacity that is serving rural areas; (4) to analyze the inter-relationship between villages and higher order central places through flow systems; (5) to identify and analyze the direct impact of road transportation on rural development with focus on agricultural development, nonagricultural development, population mobility and quality of life; and (6) to recommend transport planning and policy approaches for rural development. An empirical study is undertaken in two districts, one, Tha Rua District from the Central Region and another, Bo Thong District from the Eastern region of Thailand. The two districts are located at about the same distance from the provincial headquarters and national capital, the former is categorized as "developed" and the latter as "underdeveloped" district. The research is based on both secondary and primary sources of data. The major source of data is collected through a questionnaire survey of 341 households, sampled by a random sampling method from three subareas selected from each district. This is equally supplemented by a checklist of spatial parameters related to each village, as well as secondary sources of data collected from local administrative offices and other publications. Appropriate research hypotheses are developed and analyzed to meet the objectives of this research. A network analysis of road connectivity is done by using beta, gamma and alpha indices. A flow analysis of goods and people is also done by using gravity and interaction models. Accessibility to services is analyzed using correlation and regression techniques and explained by transportation zones. The impact analysis of rural roads for different aspects of socioeconomic issues related to rural development in general, household economy and quality of life in particular are done by computing indices. The findings reveal that the road density, degree of connectivity and degree of network development are almost identical for two districts despite the differences in the number of edges and nodes, hence indicate the same level of road networks development in general. Since all 11 villages are connected by roads, the physical linkage or connectivity is not, therefore, a serious issue. Nevertheless, differences in quality of roads between two districts exist in terms of Thai standard criteria. However, the quality of roads is the major issue in two districts. Although except for a small proportion of rural households, at least one means of transportation is owned by rural households, largely invested from their household earnings or savings, and majority of the means are utilized for both household and economic purposes regardless of variation in two areas. There is a wide variation on the distribution of means by occupation of household heads and by subareas within a district. The marketing of agricultural produces follows a gravity function, i.e., selling agricultural produces to higher order central places at nearby distance. A distance-decay function in people's mobility is confirmed by the travel pattern of the people engaged in out-of-village activities (service and wage labor). Eight types of means are used for different types of trips (daily commuting, regular and occasional) which generate travel zones, each zone dominated by one or several means of transportation with significant variation in two study areas. Commuting to work places, economic activities and educational purposes generate most daily trips, access to services generate once a week to a month or occasional trips and social activities mostly generate occasional trips. Each household takes at least one trip regularly, once a week to a month as well as occasionally for attaining a service and/or for social activities. Four zones of travels for activities and access to services are identified in which specific means dominate a particular zone with significant variations over two districts. Consequently, distance, time, and money spent per trip are higher in underdeveloped area than in developed one due to the latter being facilitated by good quality of roads and an articulated central places where former is lacking very much. Construction of roads, hence accessibility has been proved of great significance in rural socioeconomic setting. From the existing situation, the improved quality of roads has contributed higher accessibility (increased transportation frequencies, services, and safety, improved vehicle condition and decreased fares), increased commuting facilities, convenience to travel and easy communications and access to information. This situation has added substantial contribution to the process of diversification of rural economy, rural urban integration, increased rural competitiveness, better extension of support services, increased market threshold, and easy access to agricultural market place along with easy access to social services. A development approach with a focus on community participation for the improvement of quality of roads and higher accessibility is recommended for planning as the important option in the field of rural transportation development in Thailand. Based on this study it is very much clear that the improvement in the quality of rural roads will ensure and promote the quality of living in rural areas.
Year1996
Corresponding Series Added EntryAsian Institute of Technology. Dissertation ; no. HS-96-07
TypeDissertation
SchoolSchool of Environment, Resources, and Development (SERD)
DepartmentOther Field of Studies (No Department)
Academic Program/FoSHuman Settlement (HS)
Chairperson(s)Routray, Jayant K.;
Examination Committee(s)Amin, A.T.M. Nurul;Kaew Nualchawee ;
Scholarship Donor(s)Royal Thai Government ;
DegreeThesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1996


Usage Metrics
View Detail0
Read PDF0
Download PDF0