1 AIT Asian Institute of Technology

Supplementary feeding standards of pelleted feed for nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

AuthorDhali, Abdur Rashid
Call NumberAIT Thesis no. AE-92-31
Subject(s)Fishes--Feeding and feeds

NoteA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Master of Science, School of Environment, Resources and Development
PublisherAsian Institute of Technology
AbstractTwo experiments were carried out in 200 m2 static water earthen ponds to evaluate the value of supplementary feed and assess to economic benefit for Nile tilapia ( Oreochomis nilloticus) with fish of 25 a nd 100 g fishes. Thirty six h a pas were set up in 3 ponds at stocking density 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 fish/m2 ) with and without feeding treatment. Ponds were fertilized with chemical fertilzers, urea (0.4 gram/m2 / d ay) and triple super phosphate (0. 2 gram/m2 / day). Fish in the feeding treatment were given pelleted feed, ( 20 % protein) ad libitum~ twice daily. Net yield per ( 5 m2 ) hapa permonthin creased and individual body weight decreased with stocking densities. Individual body weight of supplementary feeding fishes was hi g her than non fed treatments. Highest extrapolated yields was 98 . 7 and 49.3 ton/hectare/year at a density 12 fish/m2 in feeding and non feeding treatments respectively. Food conversion ratio (FCR) decreased with stocking density. Lowest FCR was 1.55 in large fishes with stocking density 12/fish/m2 • Average survival rate was 95% but the survival rate was higher in small fishes. Feeding standards for small and large fishes were analysed by regress ion. Net yield (g /hapa) had linear relation with feed intake (g/hapa). Feeding standards involved several factors such as natural food, supplemental feed and water quality . So, feeding standard will be applicable in similar condition. All treatments of without supplementary feeding were profitable but treatments at 1 2 fish/m2 gave the highest net yield a nd income. Supplementary feed was profitable in large fishes (100-200 g)in at high density > 6 fish/m2 but high density (12 fish/m2 ) was the most economic (5635 ~/ha/year).
Year1992
TypeThesis
SchoolSchool of Environment, Resources, and Development (SERD)
DepartmentDepartment of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources (Former title: Department of Food Agriculture, and BioResources (DFAB))
Academic Program/FoSAgricultural and Food Engineering (AE)
Chairperson(s)Yakupitiyage, Amararatne
Examination Committee(s)Edwards, Peter ;Little, David C.
Scholarship Donor(s)The British council. ;
DegreeThesis (M.Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1992


Usage Metrics
View Detail0
Read PDF0
Download PDF0